- Decline of surveys. As more companies thirst for customer feedback, the number of surveys has escalated. But there is a limit to customers’ willingness to complete surveys. As completion rates get more difficult to maintain, companies will become more efficient with the questions they ask, target questions at specific customers in specific situations, and stop relying as much on multiple-choice questions. Tidbit: When we asked large companies with VoC programs about the changing importance of eight listening posts, multiple choice survey questions were at the bottom of the list.
- Rise of text analytics.Companies are learning that some of the richest insights from customers come from unstructured content like comments on surveys, calls into the contact center, social media conversations, and chat sessions with agents. Companies will shift more of their focus towards collecting and analyzing these types of feedback. Tidbit: Nearly three-quarters of large companies with VoC programs are using or considering text analytics.
- “Big data” predictive insights. It’s hard to talk about trends without discussing big data (in order to be fully buzz-word compliant). But what will this term mean for customer experience in 2013? Companies will blend together customer feedback data with troves of other data they have in CRM and other systems about customer transactions and value. Using this large dataset, they will predict customer satisfaction levels and Net Promoter Scores across their customer base. Since analytics requires more than just technology, we’ll see a surge of demand for data scientists. Tidbit: More than half of large companies with a VoC program are using or considering predictive analytics, but only one-third of large companies feel that they are effective at integrating CRM data in their VoC efforts.
- Anticipatory service. As companies gain a deeper understanding of customers through research and analytics, they will use that information to develop more individualized customer experiences. Look for companies to route callers to phone agents most likely to help them based on anticipating why they are calling, train front line employees with different scripts based on anticipating a customers’ needs/interests/emotional styles, and proactively recover from service issues before customers even complain about them based on detecting potential changes to a customers’ loyalty. Tidbit: When companies responded very poorly after a bad experience, 47% of consumers stopped spending completely with the company. When they had a very good response, only 6% stopped spending and 37% increased their spending.
- Experience-infused product development. We’ll see more companies create products with customer experience embedded throughout the entire development process. What will this look like? Product teams will define usability requirements, set minimum experience thresholds for product launch, and design the entire service lifecycle. Fidelity Investments evaluates all new product and experience efforts via a CX scorecard to determine the level of customer experience risk involved in a proposed project. Its “Customer Lens” process incorporates standards and checkpoints into business case and new product development methodologies to deliver more customer-centric experiences.
- Design-based process improvement. As customer experience efforts highlight the need to redesign more operational processes, companies will combine customer experience efforts with other process improvement efforts such as lean sigma and design thinking. These combinations, such as GM’s bringing together of customer experience and product quality, will merge process-centric tools with the power of deep customer empathy. We’ll also see more companies follow firms such as Intuit that are embedding design thinking across their organizations (check out the Stanford d.school). Tidbit: 74% of CX professionals think that customer experience design is important for their company, but only 34% think that their firm is good at it.
- Loyalty-focused contact centers. As companies more fully understand the link between customer experience and loyalty, especially with customer service, they will increasingly view contact centers as value-creators and not just cost centers. Some of the effects in 2013: less focus on average-handle-time and other productivity metrics, more focus on customer feedback and quality metrics, more on-shoring of previously off-shored interactions, and more investment in agent training and coaching. Tidbit: Consumers that are satisfied with customer service interactions are more than 4 times as likely to repurchase than those who are dissatisfied.
- Appreciation of employee assets. Companies are beginning to see the deep connection between employee engagement and customer experience. So many firms will focus on their employees in 2013. We’ll see more CX programs develop internal ambassador programs and an initial wave of HR organizations leading employee engagement efforts across what we call Five I’s of Employee Engagement: Inform, Inspire, Instruct, Involve, and Incent. Tidbit: Highly engaged employees are 5.8 times more committed to helping their companies succeed and 3.5 times more likely to do something good for their employers that is not expected of them.
- Mobile, mobile, mobile. Consumers will have more smart phones, more mobile apps, more tablets for them to do even more things wherever they go. Companies will increasingly integrate mobile into their product offerings and service experiences while integrating mobile with other channels, especially when it comes to combining desktop applications with mobile apps being used in physical stores. Tidbit: 31% of U.S. consumers use apps on their mobile phones on a daily basis.
- Software as an Experience. The initial rise of cloud-based software (a.k.a. SaaS, or software-as-a-service) focused on renting access to software instead of the historical approach of selling licenses. As cloud-based software expands, we’ll see these offerings cater more explicitly to the needs of customers. How? More simple, highly-focused, specialized applications (like smartphone apps), more focus on quick initial usability, more sharing of best practices (usage, not technical), and customization based on behavioral analysis of users. Tidbit: Net Promoter Scores for tech vendors are more correlated to customer experience than product performance.
- Resurgence of values. As more companies push forward on their CX journeys, they’ll find that there’s nothing holding their efforts together. The desire to improve customer experience will fall victim to other priorities if the effort is not tied to the core values of the company. But many organizations are so heavily focused on their operations that they’ve lost sight of their raisons d’ĂȘtre. I expect more companies to articulate and recommit to a core set of values like those of Zappos and Whole Foods, customer promises like that of TNT Express, and mission statements like that of the Dallas Cowboys.
- Rethinking risk-experience trade-offs. Customer experience is often constrained by rigid requirements imposed by legal, compliance and risk management teams. As a result, companies are forced to collect additional information from customers, add additional steps in processes, and eliminate valuable self-service options. In 2013, given the increased emphasis on customer experience, we’ll see companies push back on and successfully eliminate many of the most egregious experience roadblocks.
- Continuing CX education. Some customer experience practices are becoming standardized enough to create educational curriculum. In 2013, we’ll see more corporate training departments rolling out CX training, MBA programs incorporating more CX content into service and marketing courses, and the creation of standalone CX academic courses. Tidbit: The percentage of CX professionals that see training as an important professionals development goal increased from 52% in 2011 to 57% in 2012.
The customer experience for companies doing business with other companies stinks. Three independent studies that Forrester Research has conducted over the past year indicate that the business-to-business (B2B) experience is perceived as worse than that in the bottom-of-the-barrel consumer industries such as TV service providers and health insurance plans in Forrester’s 2011 Customer Experience Index. This is not surprising for several reasons. Many B2B firms believe that customer experience is something that only consumer-focused firms like Disney, Zappos, and Ritz Carlton need to consider. Moreover, many B2B companies argue that purchasing decisions are made for a complex set of reasons other than customer experience. Finally, they often say that because of the relatively low number of accounts, they already provide a personalized experience through account management teams.
Firms making these rationalizations miss several important points. First, if word of mouth is important to sales, then so is customer experience. Forrester’s consumer research shows that only 23% of individuals trust radio and TV ads — and only 19% trust direct mail — while 73% trust recommendations of friends and family. There is little reason to believe that the numbers are much different for B2B. And while Facebook may not amplify opinions, social media tools used for professional networking in online communities certainly do. Second, firms that have poor experiences with other firms buy less. The experience design company, Walker Information, finds that firms whose customers are trapped spend significantly less, grow more slowly, and have lower gross margins than those that are truly loyal. Forrester’s research suggests similar outcomes, with strong correlations between customer experience ratings and likelihood to purchase again, recommend, and switch. Third, customer experience is not limited to the customer-facing employees, such as account managers and call center representatives, or the contract holders at the client’s company. Rather, the end-to-end experience often includes interactions driven by back-office employees that make life difficult and frustrating for important stakeholders who could drive future business at the client firm.
Improving the B2B customer experience from its dismal state is more than a marketing effort. After all, marketing only owns a small portion of all of the interactions with customers. Companies such as John Deere, Maersk Lines, Fidelity, Philips Electronics, and Intuit understand this and as a result have significant B2B customer experience efforts under way. While in some respects the B2B experience is more complex than the business-to-consumer (B2C) environment (e.g., diverse stakeholders within a client), other issues with partners, resellers, agents, and other intermediaries that impact or even deliver the experience are very similar. In fact, the best practices that the best B2C firms use apply to B2B firms. Best practices include:
- Defining the intended experience for the target customer. As experience design firm Beyond Philosophy puts it: “To improve customer experience implies you are somewhere today and you are heading somewhere else. The strategic question is ‘where?'” To get started, firms need to define who exactly they mean by the customer . . . something all the more important for B2B companies, which have many stakeholders inside of a client. One manufacturer found that it had 26 personas across departments just to describe those maintaining purchased equipment within client firms. Some were upward of 10 years old, and all were at varying stages of development. By rationalizing these down to just a handful of well-developed personas based on behavior rather than departmental role, those redesigning the experience — a cross-functional team that included employees as diverse as engineers, contact center staff, and account managers — created a common vocabulary and target to work on. Another B2B firm, in trying to decide for which stakeholder within its client base it should prioritize, realized that concentrating on improving the experience for lower-level logistics clerks would swing much more business its way than improving the customer experience for higher-level contract managers.
- Understanding the customer perspective. The most challenging aspect to improving the customer experience is for firms to shift to outside-in thinking in which employees put themselves in customers’ shoes, rather than today’s inside-out mindset that focuses primarily on narrowly defined internal metrics. Common experience design practices, such as behavioral personas, customer journey maps, and voice of the customer (VoC) programs, can help turn this around. Export Development Canada’s customer journey map for its insurance group found more than 35 internal handoffs between departments across 14 customer touchpoints with little consistency in total time to completion. The group used journey (value stream) maps to focus project teams and Lean methodologies for aligning internal business, processes, people, and systems. The result was a 60% reduction in processing time with improved predictability, a 24% increase in Net Promoter Score (NPS), and reduced waste.
- Aiming to change the culture. Firms serious about improving the experience realize that a cultural transformation needs to take place. Key practices such as recruitment and hiring, onboarding and training, internal communications and storytelling, performance metrics, and rewards and recognition systems aimed at changing the beliefs and behavioral norms of internal employees can similarly be applied to partners, resellers, agents, and other third parties that affect the B2B customer experience.
The widely divergent range of customer experience scores that B2B firms achieve in Forrester’s studies today suggest there is a lot of room to differentiate based on customer experience. And that could translate into big dollars. In the B2C space, Forrester estimates that a 10-point increase in its Customer Experience Index score can amount to up to $1.5 billion. But changing culture isn’t easy. Those that get the jump will create something that takes time and is hard to replicate.
